Professor Bullying is It?

Everyone is aware of peer bullying peers and the education system is adamant about not allowing the situation to arise and if it does how to protect the bullied student. And when teachers intimidate students. With the publicity surrounding peer to peer bullying because it is the idea of ​​the teacher to student bullying are largely ignored in today's education system, unless it involves sexual behavior? There is a definition for bullying teachers? Bullying by a teacher is defined as a pattern of behavior, rooted in a power differential that threatens, damages, humiliate, induces fear, or student cause significant emotional distress. Abuse of power that tends to be chronic and often expressed in public, a form of humiliation that generates attention degrading the student in front of others, the ability of students are degraded and identity is ridiculed. In almost all cases of teacher bullying is a singular goal that bullying several times. Victims are chosen based on any vulnerability or because of a personal attribute devalued the teacher sees the student. The teacher often refers to how the student is distinguished from other students that the teacher perceives as more capable and valuable. Consequently, the student because a scapegoat among peers.

Teachers who do not feel intimidated their abusive behavior is justified and claim provation by the student. They disquise their behavior as an appropriate part of education and abuse masquerading as an appropriate disciplinary response to unacceptable behavior by the student. However, the student is subjected to deliberate humiliation by teachers that can never serve a legitimate educational purpose.

Students who are bullied by teachers feel confused, angry, scared, full of self-doubt, and have deep concerns about their skills in both academic and social. For example, an abusive teacher will argue that a student who is complaining is simply trying to excuse their questionable performance, shifting the attention of misconduct teachers means a discussion and student motivation to complain. Bullying by a teacher actually produced a hostile environment for the student who is untenable for academic reasons; impair learning and the ability of a student to fulfll academic requirements. A hate crime is simply bullying by targeting based on the characteristics of race, sexual orientation or religious beliefs.

Bullying is nonphysical, but nonetheless, pervasive and powerful with fearing ostracism students and humiliation, and physical damage. Touch any abusive behavior complaint puts the student at risk of reprisals by the teacher, including the use of notes as penalty.

Students are selected as targets based on a difference perceived by the teacher who is undervalued. A victim of the student feels emotionally disturbed anf fear, no place to seek help. When the administration do nothing to protect the student, they confirm the teacher has the right to use the professional authority and tacitly approve and legitimize the abuse of the abuser.

In the Supreme Court in Davis v. Board of Education Davis Monroe County Court decided that schools that receive federal funds may be held financially responsible, where employees are "deliberately indifferent" to the behaviors of harassment, including harassment of students who are "serious, pervasive, and objectively offensive. "This decision has defined four criteria to consider the responsibility of schools:

1) School officials had actual knowledge of driving,

2) Schools were deliberately indifferent to accomplish,

3) The school had control of aggressor and where it took place, and

4) The school's response or lack of response was reasonable considering this knowledge. The decision also suggests that schools have policies and procedures for handling misconduct by pace such as teacher-student harassment / abuse. Indeed, if the school has a behavior that creates a hostile environment for the student in a classroom, and school officials have received sufficient notice, but fail to act, then the risk of school two compensatory damages and punitive damages.

This case only proves that the intimidation of teachers exists. This case has officials responsible for actions of teachers. If the student is a teacher being bullied, talk and talk. Here are some differences between maintaining control of the class and intimidation by the Campaign Florida Anti bullying;

Educators that students know they care. Intimidation that students know who's boss.

Educators to teach self-control. Bullies exercise their own control.

Educators define rigid expectations. Bullies rule with steel whims.

Educators spread minor disruptions with humor. Bullies to disturbances in the clashes.

Educators advise private chronic discipline problems. Bullies publicly humiliate chronic misbehaviors.

Educators are cautious. Bullies are trial.

Educators, aware of the power they have over their students, choose your words and your actions carefully. Bullies exercise its power recklessly, often using anger and intimidation.

Educators help all students feel successful. Bullies punish students to gain.

Educators tackle bad behavior. Bullies attack the character of bad behavior.

Educators see the uniqueness of each student. Bullies compared children each other.

The teachers treat all students with respect. Bullies clearly that all students deserve respect.

Educators emphasize good behavior. Bullies are examples of bad behavior.

Educators are proactive; they create classroom environments that minimize the bad behavior of the student.

Bullies are reactive; they blame the students for the lack of order in the classroom.

Educators educate. Bullies humble.